{"id":62248,"date":"2021-12-11T21:19:20","date_gmt":"2021-12-11T13:19:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/?p=62248"},"modified":"2021-12-11T21:19:20","modified_gmt":"2021-12-11T13:19:20","slug":"purple-swamphen-intraspecific-agonistic-behaviour","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/2021\/12\/11\/purple-swamphen-intraspecific-agonistic-behaviour\/","title":{"rendered":"Purple Swamphen \u2013 intraspecific agonistic behaviour"},"content":{"rendered":"

Intraspecific agonistic (conflict\/combative) behaviour is common in Purple Swamphens (Porphyrio porphyrio<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>viridis<\/em>).\u00a0Encyclopedia.com<\/a>\u00a0(2020) states \u201cIn the purple swamphen, the position of the tail and wings is important in agonistic display, while differing body postures indicate aggression or anxiety<\/em>\u201d. Wells (1999) states \u201cPersistent pumping of the tail flirts the lower tail-coverts as a social signal<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

1. Purple Swamphen in flight.<\/p>\n

I have observed intraspecific agonistic behaviour previously on a number of occasions and reported it once (Amar 2010). I saw it extensively again yesterday. In trying to make sense of it, I would like to quote Craig (1977) who aptly says \u201cThe problem of subjective description further arises from fitting observed behaviours into previously named displays<\/em>\u201d. I have reached a better idea of what some of this behaviour means and hope to describe some here. John L. Craig has done extensive work on understanding the behaviour of the Purple Swamphens in New Zealand (Porphyrio porphyrio melanotus<\/em>). While the subspecies is different, his work lends many insights into the species. I may not agree with all of his observations (and I am watching a different subspecies) but they are superbly described and illustrated; a must read.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

2. Two adults in a \u201chead flick” with wings exaggerated…<\/p>\n

Purple Swamphens are known to have a variety of mating systems, ranging from monogamous mating to communal mating. Thai National Parks (2020) states \u201cIn the western parts of the range the pattern of social behaviour tends to be monogamy, but cooperative breeding groups are more common in the eastern parts of the range. These groups may consist of multiple females and males sharing a nest or a male female pair with helpers drawn from previous clutches.<\/em>\u201d Dakota (2009) notes that \u201cGroups usually have a stable membership, but some groups which are formed early in the breeding season and which have too many males may change membership. The members of the groups arrange themselves into a dominance hierarchy using sex and age as factors to determine each other\u2019s place. When juveniles grow up in a communal breeding setting, they will remain in their natal territories after maturity.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

3. Head down with wings up and white lower tail-coverts in flirted posture.<\/p>\n

I watched intraspecific agonistic behaviour, with 7 birds involved, continually over 15 minutes. Two of these birds were immature. The location where it happened has many, very large ex-mining pools serving as a wetland habitat. The one I was watching was 200 by 200 meters across, with extensive Water Hyacinth (<\/span>Eichhornia crassipes<\/em>) cover. I was sufficiently far away so that their behaviour could be observed undisturbed. The density and mobility of the Water Hyacinth raft meant that bird could sink lower into the vegetation and some behaviour was harder to observe. In the past I was unsure if this was courting behaviour, territorial breeding behaviour or territorial feeding behaviour (Amar 2010). My current opinion is that the behaviour I observed is related to breeding.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

4. Birds with wings expanded hunch display.<\/p>\n

I am of the opinion that this type of intraspecific agonistic behaviour is related to developing a hierarchical structure within a \u2018group membership\u2019. The behaviour began with a \u2018call to arms\u2019 \u2013 a long drawn out call by one adult and a \u2018fly-in\u2019 by that adult into a group of 4 other birds. Two other birds then flew in to join the altercation. The intraspecific agonistic behaviour is best described as a \u2018melee\u2019, a free-for-all tussle and fight.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

5. Pulling feathers with beaks.<\/p>\n

The behaviour observed (using some terminology by Craig 1977) included sparring with feet, pecking and pulling of feather with beaks (image 4), birds jumping up (launching) with feet ready for clawing (image 7), wings exaggerated up (image 6), head down with wings up and white lower tail-coverts flirted posture (image 4), wings expanded hunch display (image 4), extensive circular chasing\/pursuing. Occasionally some loud calls were made during the fight.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

6. With wings exaggerated up…<\/p>\n

Once it was completed to their satisfaction, birds settled down together in the same location to preen but I noticed that two adults pulled aside and did a \u201chead flick, wings exaggerated up, tail fully up\u201d posture (Craig 1977) (image 2). This spoke to me of courtship. These two birds then flew off together.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

7. …with feet ready for clawing…<\/p>\n

I said earlier that this conflict behaviour appeared to me to be related to breeding, the development of a hierarchical structure within a social group. The reasons I think so are:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. No attempt to chase any bird away from the location<\/li>\n
  2. Immature birds were involved<\/li>\n
  3. The post conflict behaviour of the group<\/li>\n
  4. The behaviour of two adults after the altercation<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    8. Birds lurching with feet ready for clawing.<\/p>\n

    References:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Encyclopedia.com<\/a>(2020).\u00a0Rails, Coots, and Moorhens (Rallidae).\u00a0<\/em>Available here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.encyclopedia.com\/environment\/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps\/rails-coots-and-moorhens-rallidae<\/a><\/li>\n
    2. Wells, D.R. (1999)\u00a0The birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula: Vol. 1 (Non-Passarines)<\/em>. Christopher Helm, London.<\/li>\n
    3. Amar-Singh HSS. (2010)\u00a0Purple Swamphen: Social behaviour and calls<\/em>. Bird Ecology Study Group. Available here:\u00a0https:\/\/besgroup.org\/2011\/01\/30\/purple-swamphen-social-behaviour-and-calls\/<\/a><\/li>\n
    4. John L. Craig (1977) The behaviour of the pukeko, Porphyrio porphyrio melanotus, New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 4:4, 413-433. Available here:\u00a0https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1080\/03014223.1977.9517966<\/a><\/li>\n
    5. Thai National Parks. (2020)Purple Swamphen<\/em>.\u00a0Available here: \u00a0https:\/\/www.thainationalparks.com\/species\/purple-swamphen<\/a><\/li>\n
    6. Dakota, A. (2009)\u00a0“Porphyrio porphyrio”<\/em>(On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Available here: \u00a0athttps:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/accounts\/Porphyrio_porphyrio\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

       <\/p>\n

      Amar-Singh HSS (Dato’ Dr)<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      Location: Outskirts of Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia<\/p>\n

      Habitat: Wetlands<\/p>\n

      Date: 13th January 2019<\/p>\n

      Equipment: Nikon D500 SLR with Nikon AF-S Nikkor 500mm f\/5.6E PF ED VR, handheld<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Intraspecific agonistic (conflict\/combative) behaviour is common in Purple Swamphens (Porphyrio porphyrio\u00a0viridis).\u00a0Encyclopedia.com\u00a0(2020) states \u201cIn the purple swamphen, the position of the tail and wings is important in agonistic display, while differing body postures indicate aggression or anxiety\u201d. Wells (1999) states \u201cPersistent pumping of the tail flirts the lower tail-coverts as a social signal\u201d. 1. Purple Swamphen […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":62250,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[957,88],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62248"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62248"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62248\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/62250"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/besgroup.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}